Compare
XDC, XRP, XLM, HBAR, ALGO, QNT, IOTA, ADA and LINK are often sold as “ISO 20022 coins”. Here is what each one verifiably has to do with the standard, with live prices and sources.
ISO 20022 is an international standard for financial messages, such as payment instructions between banks. It is maintained under ISO's financial services committee (TC68); SWIFT runs its Registration Authority and the official site, iso20022.org.
It describes messages, not money or blockchains. There is no certification for it, and the Registration Authority says cryptocurrencies are not registered by it. A blockchain project can still build software that reads or writes ISO 20022 messages, or work with banks that use them.
For cross-border payments, SWIFT ended the period in which old MT messages and ISO 20022 could both be used on 22 November 2025 (swift.com). A follow-on requirement for structured addresses, planned for November 2026, was postponed on 27 August 2026 (swift.com).
"Cryptocurrencies are not inherently ISO 20022 compliant. There is a lot of confusion and misleading information on the web referring to ISO 20022 compliant cryptocurrencies but those statements are not correct. The cryptocurrencies are not managed and not registered by ISO 20022."
ISO 20022 Registration Authority iso20022.org
Documentation and an ecosystem messaging API; no formal role in the standard and no bank integration named in primary sources.
The only one in this group with a formal role in the standard (Ripple the company, not the XRP token).
No formal role; one third-party bank network on Stellar uses ISO 20022 messaging.
Nothing verifiable. Hedera's docs glossary lists "seven DLTs" that "adhere" to ISO 20022, without a source, which the ISO 20022 Registration Authority contradicts.
XDC vs HBAR →
Nothing verifiable on Algorand's own sites; the label comes from third-party lists.
XDC vs ALGO →
A marketed "ISO 20022-native" platform and a UK bank project; no formal role in the standard.
Nothing verifiable from IOTA Foundation sources.
XDC vs IOTA →
Nothing verifiable; the label may confuse ISO 20022 with ISO/IEC 27001, an unrelated security standard.
XDC vs ADA →
No formal role; took part in SWIFT pilots that used ISO 20022 messaging around blockchain transfers.
Checked 3 Oct 2026 against iso20022.org, swift.com and each project's own sources.
| Consensus | Block time | Smart contracts | Compare | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDC Network XDC | $0.03245 | $647.4M | -1.20% | XDPoS 2.0: delegated proof of stake with 108 masternodes, Chained HotStuff BFT (since 30 Sep 2024) | About 2 seconds | EVM (Solidity) | — |
| XRP Ledger XRP | $1.520 | $95.84B | +2.30% | XRP Ledger Consensus Protocol | Validators agree on a new ledger every 3 to 5 seconds | No general-purpose virtual machine on the main ledger (built-in escrow, DEX and AMM); a separate EVM sidechain exists | XDC vs XRP → |
| Stellar XLM | $0.22308 | $7.82B | +3.59% | Stellar Consensus Protocol (federated Byzantine agreement) | About 5 seconds per ledger | Soroban (Rust compiled to WebAssembly), live since 19 March 2024 | XDC vs XLM → |
| Hedera HBAR | $0.10397 | $4.57B | +2.34% | Hashgraph (proof of stake) | No blocks; about 3 seconds to consensus (stated by Hedera) | EVM (Solidity) through the Hedera Smart Contract Service | XDC vs HBAR → |
| Algorand ALGO | $0.13244 | $1.2B | +1.06% | Pure proof of stake | Under 3 seconds (stated by Algorand) | Algorand Virtual Machine (TEAL; Python supported) | XDC vs ALGO → |
| Quant QNT | $249.65 | $3.63B | -3.48% | Not a blockchain: QNT lives on Ethereum (proof of stake) | Not applicable (token on Ethereum) | Not applicable; Overledger issues multi-chain "QRC-20" tokens | XDC vs QNT → |
| IOTA IOTA | $0.05938 | $277.67M | +9.61% | Delegated proof of stake | Not stated | MoveVM on layer 1, plus the IOTA EVM | XDC vs IOTA → |
| Cardano ADA | $0.26218 | $9.84B | +7.48% | Ouroboros Praos (proof of stake) | About 20 seconds on average | Plutus (Haskell-based) | XDC vs ADA → |
| Chainlink LINK | $14.260 | $10.67B | +1.45% | Not a blockchain: oracle networks serve other chains | Not applicable | Not applicable; supplies data and cross-chain messaging (CCIP) to smart contracts | XDC vs LINK → |
CoinGecko · updated 10 min ago
None are certified, because ISO 20022 has no certification and no registry of compliant cryptocurrencies (iso20022.org FAQ). The coins usually called "ISO 20022 coins" have, at most, a formal role (Ripple on the Registration Management Group), software that maps ISO 20022 messages, or pilots with systems that use them.
No coin can be. What XDC verifiably has: developer documentation for mapping ISO 20022 messages to XDC transactions, and an ISO 20022 messaging API launched on XDC in 2022 by Impel, a company building on XDC. No bank integration is named in primary sources.
No. What is true is that Ripple, the company, is a member of the ISO 20022 Registration Management Group (member list). That is a role for Ripple in the standards process, not a certification of XRP.
It defines bank messages, not assets. Crypto amounts can be carried as data in ISO 20022 messages but are not validated, and digital token identifiers are covered by a different standard, ISO 24165 (iso20022.org FAQ). Most "ISO 20022 coin" claims refer to projects building software that talks to banks.
Market data
Network
Earn with XDC
Start here
Ecosystem
Calculators
Read-only tools
Nothing here asks for a seed phrase or private key. Everything runs in your browser.
All tools